A Rose for Emily Analysis Essay: The author describes the dank world of Emily Grierson who is the main character of this short story, a horrible world full of aberrant psychology and necrophilia. There are several themes here and the major ones include tradition vs change, isolation, the power of death, the decline of the old South. The story starts with a brief account of the huge funeral of Emily Grierson attended by the whole town.
Faulkner carefully crafts his piece with meaning that begs the reader to dig deeper and unveil the message concealed between the lines.
His main focal point is the protagonist Emily Grierson, who is implied to be a mysterious individual. Faulkner lays out a complex map to follow, which leads his reader along a journey through the ideologies of the Pre and Post Civil War generations and sends an overwhelming message that the new South was not developing easily.
The story leaves the reader where he or she started, but provides additional backdrop from a series of flashbacks that do not consistently move in time. With this said, Faulkner has chosen the period of time where the South was beginning to cope with the realization that their previous lifestyle had been evil.
The Old South was a corrupt society. African Americans were owned and treated like dogs. In fact one third of all white families owned slaves. Even whites were discriminated against, specifically women. The common southern belle stereotype is far from true.
These women had more kids, married younger, had a shorter education, and were more likely to die young than the women in the North. They also lived isolated not only because they had less access to other women, but also because husbands and fathers generally controlled them.
Faulkner takes his character Emily Grierson and presents her as overly sheltered in one timespan. Emily is portrayed from the opinions of the townspeople and it is made clear that a one-dimensional father, who is very selfish and controlling, raised her in a society that praises that sort of behavior.
The narrator in a way agreed with this attitude. This demonstrates how one would be uncomfortable to grow morally with the younger generation during that time or even for the younger generation to follow in the path of the North, since all their parents and elders would frown upon it.
By the time Emily started to develop she was drown back into her old ways. She began to see a northerner but the generation of people who would have assisted her transition did not see her struggle, rather they were more concerned that she had gotten away with not paying taxes.
The story begins to slowly move forward in time during scene two when it is disclosed that Miss Emily is getting away with not maintaining her home. The townspeople never asked, why is she acting this way, is she in need of help?
Instead she was lost in the progression of time and left behind. The town dealt with their concerns by sneaking around her home and gossiping. At this moment the time being portrayed is that of the Old South.
This quote looks back and provides insight into why the Judge may have been so keen on looking after her. At the same instant this line allows the reader to obtain a historical reference point to compare the lifestyles of today and yesterday.
She needed to be taken care of. The radical event placement takes the focus off history moving forward and leaves the reader free to evaluate the decades of history without being naturally inclined to view the events in the A, leads to B, leads to C fashion.
I am inclined to agree with Harris since Emily is described after she has died. Do to this the reader infers that she is a mysterious figure, a character that holds all the significance.
Why would Faulkner end his nonlinear drama at the end of his chosen time period? He did so to keep his readers attention throughout the text. Instead of seeing the back and forth struggle of those in need before and after the revolution and its ramifications the reader would be disgusted. It would be appalling to here of a woman who killed and afterwards find out she used to teach kids how to paint in her home.
Faulkner ends his tale so dramatically that further interpretation reveals that there are still people who are suffering.
The narration is like the deduction of the mind. What falls between life and death is the thoughts that leave some and haunt others. There are individuals in the South who hurt, an internal struggle of sorts that readers of the time would identify with along with readers of all history.A Rose For Emily “A Rose for Emily”, by William Faulkner discusses that change should be recognized by everyone.
What was in the past for Emily, should be left in past. Although her father and Colonel Satoris are dead, Emily refuses to accept the fact that her loved ones are gone.
Essay on Insight On Necrophilia,whats T. Words 3 Pages. Insight on Necrophilia Necrophilia in A Rose for Emily Essay Words | 3 Pages. who at this point in time had been dead nearly ten years. Another indication of Emily?s mental condition is the insinuation of necrophilia. Simply put, necrophilia is a sexual attraction to corpses.
A Rose for Emily Short Fiction Essay “A Rose for Emily” In the story “A Rose for Emily”, William Faulkner associates the main character, Miss Emily with a sense of beauty, privilege, and mystery.
Raised in a rich southern atmosphere it is clear why the town of Jefferson is so infatuated with her life. A Rose for Emily” begins with Emily’s funeral and ends just after her funeral. The story leaves the reader where he or she started, but provides additional backdrop from a series of flashbacks that do not consistently move in time.
A Rose for Emily by Faulkner is a conventional Freudian explanation of incest and necrophilia. The incestuous relation between Emily and her father had indelible impact on the future life of Emily. Her father’s motive to indulge her in assumed incestuous relationship is considered a protective tool.
A Rose For Emily Necrophilia typically means a sexual attraction to dead bodies. In a broader sense, there also describes a powerful desire to control another, usually in the context of a romantic or deeply personal relationship.